1. Strategic Context – The Role of Payment in Trade Finance
International trade finance is not merely the transfer of funds; it is a structured mechanism for risk mitigation, liquidity optimization, and trust creation between buyers and sellers operating across different legal, economic, and regulatory environments.
Every international sales contract must clearly define:
-
When payment will be made
-
How payment will be executed
-
Who bears commercial, credit, and performance risk
-
What role banks or third parties will play in the transaction
The selected payment method directly influences:
From a trade finance professional’s perspective, the objective is to design a payment structure that balances security and liquidity for both parties while minimizing financial and operational risk.
In practice, payment methods are commonly aligned with the maturity and risk profile of the trading relationship, as illustrated below:
 |
| Figure: Risk vs cost/complexity comparison of international trade payment methods (advance payment, open account, documentary collection under URC 522, and confirmed letters of credit under UCP 600). |
2. Payment Method Selection by Relationship Risk Profile:
| Stage of Relationship | Typical Risk Level | Preferred Payment Method |
| New or high-risk buyer | High | Confirmed Letter of Credit (L/C) |
| Intermediate trust | Medium | Documentary Collection |
| Long-term trusted buyer | Low | Open Account with Credit Insurance |
| E-commerce / one-off transaction | Variable | Advance Payment or Escrow |
3. Methods of Payment in International Trade – In Depth
3.1 Advance Payment (Cash in Advance)
Overview
Advance Payment, also known as Cash in Advance, is a method of international trade settlement where the importer remits payment to the exporter before shipment of goods. This method places maximum payment security with the exporter and maximum performance risk with the importer.
How Advance Payment Works
Advance payment is commonly executed through:
Funds are received by the exporter prior to shipment, production, or dispatch, depending on contract terms.
Risk Allocation Analysis
Exporter’s Perspective
From the exporter’s standpoint, advance payment offers:
-
Maximum payment security — no buyer credit risk
-
No working capital blockage
-
Operational certainty for customized or non-returnable goods
Commercial limitation:
This method can reduce competitiveness, as many importers are unwilling to prepay unless the exporter has strong market credibility.
Importer’s Perspective
For the importer, advance payment represents the highest level of financial exposure, as payment is made without shipping evidence.
This method is typically used when:
-
The exporter has an established reputation
-
Goods are tailor-made or scarce
-
The exporter holds strong bargaining power or monopoly status
Importer Risk Mitigation: Advance Payment Guarantee (APG)
To balance risk, importers often require an Advance Payment Guarantee (APG) issued by the exporter’s bank under ICC URDG 758.
This instrument protects the importer by ensuring repayment if the exporter fails to perform contractual obligations.
What Is an Advance Payment Guarantee under ICC URDG 758?
An Advance Payment Guarantee (APG) governed by ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG 758) is an irrevocable and independent bank undertaking to refund advance payments if the exporter defaults.
Key protections include:
-
Refund of prepaid funds upon compliant demand
-
Independence from the underlying sales contract
-
Global standardization under ICC rules, reducing legal ambiguity
URDG 758 is widely recognized by banks, corporates, and courts, enhancing enforceability and trust.
Core Legal Principles under URDG 758
Independence Principle (Article 5)
The guarantee is legally separate from the underlying commercial contract.
The guarantor bank’s obligation is triggered solely by a compliant demand, regardless of contractual disputes.
Documentary Principle (Article 6)
Banks deal only with documents, such as:
They do not investigate actual shipment or performance.
Principle of Strict Compliance
Any demand must strictly comply with:
Even minor discrepancies may result in rejection.
Practical Trade Finance Example
A U.S. electronics company orders custom-built components from a Japanese manufacturer. Due to the non-returnable nature of the goods, the exporter requires 50% advance payment and 50% prior to shipment.
To mitigate risk, the importer requests an Advance Payment Guarantee for the prepaid amount, issued by the exporter’s bank. If the exporter fails to deliver, the importer can recover funds by submitting a compliant demand under URDG 758.
3.2 Open Account (Deferred Payment)
What Is an Open Account in International Trade?
In an open account transaction, the exporter ships the goods first and allows the importer to pay later, typically within 30–90 days of shipment or invoice date. This is effectively short-term trade credit granted by the exporter to the foreign buyer.
Key Features of Open Account Terms
- Payment timing: Buyer pays after shipment, on agreed credit terms (e.g., 30/60/90 days).
- Documentation: Commercial invoice, transport documents (e.g., bill of lading), packing list, etc., are usually sent directly to the buyer.
- No bank payment guarantee: Unlike a Letter of Credit, banks do not guarantee payment under open account.
Main Risks for the Exporter
Because the exporter delivers before receiving payment, open account terms expose the exporter to several material risks:
- Commercial Risk
- Buyer’s default, delayed payment, or insolvency.
- Disputes about quality or quantity used as grounds for non‑payment.
- Country and Political Risk
- Exchange controls or currency transfer restrictions in the buyer’s country.
- Sanctions, war, political instability or civil unrest affecting payment.
- Sudden regulatory changes that block or delay international transfers.
- Currency and Liquidity Risk
- Adverse exchange rate movements between shipment and payment.
- Cash-flow pressure if a significant portion of sales is conducted on open account.
To make open account terms commercially acceptable and bankable, exporters commonly use a combination of the following tools:
- Export Credit Insurance
- Offered by Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) and private insurers (e.g., Euler Hermes, SACE, EXIM Bank, Atradius, Coface).
- Typically covers:
- Commercial risk (insolvency, protracted default).
- Political risk (transfer restrictions, expropriation, war events).
- Benefits:
- Helps protect accounts receivable against non‑payment.
- May improve borrowing capacity, as insured receivables are more acceptable as collateral to banks.
- Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) under ISP98
- A Standby Letter of Credit, governed by the ISP98 rules (International Standby Practices), acts as a payment guarantee.
- If the buyer fails to pay on due date, the exporter can draw under the SBLC by presenting prescribed documents (e.g., a statement of default).
- Reduces both commercial and political risk where the issuing bank is creditworthy and in a stable jurisdiction.
- Factoring (Receivables Discounting)
- The exporter sells its receivables (invoices) to a factor or finance company at a discount.
- Can be:
- With recourse (exporter retains ultimate risk of non‑payment).
- Without recourse (factor assumes credit risk on the buyer).
- Benefits:
- Immediate cash‑flow and working capital.
- Outsourced collections and credit control on overseas buyers.
- Forfaiting
- Used for medium‑term receivables (approximately 1–5 years) often related to capital goods or project exports.
- The exporter sells promissory notes, bills of exchange, or deferred payment obligations on a without‑recourse basis.
- Typically supported by a bank aval or a confirmed Letter of Credit, enhancing credit quality.
- Suited for larger ticket transactions where the buyer needs extended payment terms.
Professional Practice and When to Use Open Account
In practice, open account is now the dominant payment method in global B2B trade, especially between OECD‑based counterparties and long‑standing trading partners.
Exporters often adopt open account terms in the following situations:
- High‑trust, repeat relationships with established buyers.
- Highly competitive markets where buyers demand credit terms to award contracts.
- Standardized or commoditized products with transparent pricing and predictable demand.
However, professional exporters rarely carry large open account exposures unprotected. They typically:
- Insure receivables through ECAs or private insurers; and/or
- Discount or factor receivables with banks or factors to:
- Strengthen liquidity and working capital.
- Reduce concentration risk on a few major buyers or countries.
For business owners and finance teams, this combination of open account plus risk mitigation is often the most cost‑effective balance between competitiveness and prudence.
3.3 Documentary Collection
(Governed by ICC Uniform Rules for Collections – URC 522)
What Is Documentary Collection in Trade Finance?
Documentary collection is a trade payment method in which the exporter uses banks to present shipping documents to the importer and to collect payment or acceptance. Unlike a Letter of Credit, banks act only as intermediaries and do not guarantee payment.
Documentary collections are governed by the ICC URC 522 rules, which set out standard practices and responsibilities for banks and traders.
Main Types of Documentary Collection
There are two primary variants, based on the condition attached to the release of shipping documents:
- D/P – Documents against Payment
- The importer’s bank releases the original shipping documents only after the importer has paid.
- Payment is usually at sight (immediately upon presentation).
- Offers more security to the exporter compared to open account, because the buyer cannot take control of the goods without paying.
- D/A – Documents against Acceptance
- The importer’s bank releases the documents to the importer against the acceptance of a draft (bill of exchange) or other written promise to pay at a future date.
- The exporter takes on credit risk on the importer for the deferred payment period.
- Some exporters subsequently discount the accepted draft with a bank to accelerate cash‑flow.
Typical Process Flow for Documentary Collection
Shipment by Exporter
The exporter ships the goods and prepares the commercial documents (invoice, bill of lading, packing list, certificate of origin, etc.).
Submission to Remitting Bank
The exporter submits the shipping documents to its bank (the remitting bank) with collection instructions (e.g., D/P at sight, D/A 60 days, protest in case of non‑payment, interest, charges, etc.).
Forwarding to Collecting Bank
The remitting bank forwards the documents and instructions to the importer’s bank (the collecting or presenting bank) under URC 522.
Presentation to Importer
The collecting bank presents the documents to the importer:
- Under D/P, documents are released only once the importer pays.
- Under D/A, documents are released once the importer accepts the draft or payment undertaking.
Settlement and Remittance
Upon payment or upon maturity of the accepted draft, the collecting bank remits the funds to the remitting bank, which then credits the exporter.
Throughout this process, banks handle documents and funds but assume no obligation to pay beyond following the collection instructions and URC 522.
Advantages of Documentary Collection
Compared with pure open account, documentary collections can offer exporters a more secure structure, while still being more economical than Letters of Credit:
- Improved control over goods: The importer generally cannot obtain the title documents (e.g., original bill of lading) until payment or acceptance.
- Lower bank charges: Typically less expensive than a Letter of Credit, as banks do not undertake a direct payment obligation.
- Suitable for established counterparties: Works well where there is moderate trust and a history of performance.
- Standardized framework: URC 522 provides clear, widely recognized rules for banks and traders.
Disadvantages and Residual Risks
Despite its benefits, documentary collection still carries substantial risk for the exporter:
- No payment guarantee by banks: If the buyer refuses to pay or accept, the banks are not liable for the amount due.
- Risk of refusal or delay: Importer may delay payment, dispute documents, or simply decline to pay after shipment.
- Goods risk: If payment or acceptance is refused, the exporter may:
- Incur storage, demurrage, or return freight costs.
- Face challenges in reselling or re‑routing the goods, especially for customized products.
- Country and political risk: Similar to open account, payment can be impacted by currency controls, sanctions, or political events in the buyer’s country.
Best Use Cases for Documentary Collection
Documentary collection is commonly used in:
- Commodity and bulk trade such as:
- Agricultural commodities (e.g., coffee, grains, edible oils).
- Textiles, garments, and footwear.
- Steel, metals, and other industrial raw materials.
- Ongoing trading relationships where:
- The supplier and buyer have a track record of successful shipments.
- Market prices are relatively transparent.
- Goods can be resold if the original buyer refuses to take them.
In practice, many exporters combine documentary collections with other risk‑management tools (credit checks, partial insurance, or bank guarantees) to achieve an acceptable level of protection.
3.4 Documentary Credit (Letter of Credit – L/C)
(Governed by ICC UCP 600)
