Explain Transshipment – UCPDC Perspective
The risks associated with transshipment go beyond documentary issues. It increases exposure to delays, damage, customs complications, and unclear liability during cargo transfer between modes or carriers. Therefore, a UCPDC practitioner must approach this clause strategically. When drafting LCs, vague terms like “transshipment not allowed” should be avoided unless operationally required. A more precise clause such as “transshipment permitted, provided goods remain containerized and covered by a through bill of lading” aligns better with trade realities. Similarly, document checkers must rigorously examine the transport document for signs of a genuine through shipment, confirming continuity and container integrity. For exporters and freight forwarders, transshipment requirements should be discussed during contract negotiation and LC application to avoid last-minute complications. Ultimately, transshipment is not a minor detail but a critical intersection between commercial practice and documentary compliance. Its proper handling can mean the difference between seamless payment and costly rejection.
For more please click here: http://bit.ly/3T0ZItS